The graph below show information about the staff of Shore Hotel from 1975 to 2010

Essay topics:

The graph below show information about the staff of Shore Hotel from 1975 to 2010.

The table provides a breakdown of information in terms of the how many percentage of qualification for staff working in Shore Hotel between 1975 to 2010 over a- 35 year period. It is measured in percentage and subjects are divided into there categories. Overall, what stands out of the graph reveals that language qualification showed a downward trend, whilst speaking increased dramatically. However, leveled off was represented by speaking category.

According to the data, speaking at least two languages stood at one in ten, whilst the percentage of speaking more than two language was a twice than its figure. The next twenty years, these figure was a significant climbed to 22%. In the end of period, the figure decline slightly, pointing out 20%. However, speaking more than two languages witnessed a substantial increase, representing from 10% to 79%.

The trend of previous work experience represented remain virtually change in the period. In 1985, there was a peak at 78%, an this was followed by a sudden fall to 67% five year later. Figure then fluctuated over the next 15 years.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-16 Phạm Minh Hân 89 view
2023-08-16 Phạm Minh Hân 84 view
2023-08-16 Phạm Minh Hân 89 view
2023-08-16 Phạm Minh Hân 84 view
2023-08-16 Phạm Minh Hân 78 view
Essays by user Endah Astuti :

Comments

reveals that language qualification showed a downward trend
reveals that the language qualification showed a downward trend

leveled off was represented by speaking category.
Description: is 'leveled off' a subject?

these figure was a significant climbed to 22%.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?

remain virtually change in the period
remain a virtual change in the period

an this was followed by a sudden fall
and this was followed by a sudden fall

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 881 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.894 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.851 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.462 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.364 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4