The line graph illustrates data about how much money spent on books in four countries, over 10-year period from 1995.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that spending on books in four nations all saw upward trends. Also, the amount of money that Germany used for buying books was by far the highest during a decade.
Looking at the details, regarding Australia, expenditure started at 30 million dollars in 1995, which was nowhere near as much as Germany, at 80 million. These two figure then increased steadily by 10 million each in 1999. At this point, the amount of money spent on books in Australia remained unchanged in the next year before rocketing to over 70 million in 2005. Having dropped slightly until 2003, the figure for Germany then grew to around 95 million in 2005.
Turning to the remaining countries, in 1995, 50 and about 55 million spent on books in Italy and France respectively. The spending of France then climbed gradually, which meant that this country was still ranked the second with approximately 75 million. Meanwhile, the figure for Italy fluctuated in the first half of the period, after that it went up to above 60 million and become the country with least spending on books.
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 81
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- a survey conducted for the places in which people gain access the internet from 1998 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...above 60 million and become the country with least spending on books
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, regarding, second, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29353819683 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 210.0 22.4926829268 934% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 994.0 112.824112599 881% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 210.0 22.9334400587 916% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 60.0 5.23603664747 1146% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209178035182 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209178035182 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134191808766 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016316085273 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 105.8 13.2329268293 800% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -116.29 61.2550243902 -190% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 81.7 10.3012195122 793% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.76 8.06136585366 208% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 86.0 10.9970731707 782% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 86.0 11.0658536585 777% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.