The given line graph compares the quantity hazard materials which is generated by Company A, B and C from 2000 to 2015. An interesting point to be noted from this graph that while the quantity of waste material produced by company A and B decreased over this time frame, for company C it increased.
Overall analysis, the unit of waste products is in a tonne. Furthermore, X axis indicates the years whereas quantity of the hazerd materials is represented by Y axis.
It is manifest from this graph that, when it comes to the quantity of waste products produced by company B, it began at close to 9 tonnes in 2000 and then peaked at around 10 tonnes in 2005 before decreasing to 3 tonnes in 2015. Additionally, for company A, this amount dropped from 12 tonnes to less than 9 tonnes during 2000 and 2015.
Stating further, in 2015 the waste material quantity for company C was around 10 tonnes, which was the highest among three companies. However, in 2000, the amount was the lowest with just over 3 tonnes for the same company
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- It's generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist.Discuss both these views and gi 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 56
- The chart below shows the employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarize the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. (Study Sample) 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61081081081 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53820479171 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8591766879 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231892178703 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106081022948 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481334965344 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139787722142 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459394668364 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.