The given line graph compares the rate of emission of carbon dioxide released per person measured in Metric tonnes in four countries (the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) over a period of 40 years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the maximum amount of carbon dioxide is emitted in the United kingdom as compared to Italy and Portugal, where a steady increase can be witnessed in later years. However, Sweden observed a sharp fall in emission rate after attaining its peak value.
Getting back to details, more than 10 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide was released by a person in United Kingdom in 1967. After that it observed a steady decline by nearly 2 metric tonnes. On the other hand, in Sweden almost 8.5 metric tonnes emerged out in 1967 that later rose to its peak value of 11 metric tonnes in 1977.But in later years, it plummeted to half of its highest value approaching to just 5 on the measuring scale in 2007.
Almost 5 metric tonnes of gas released in Italy as against only 1 metric tonnes in Portugal in 1967. Thereafter, both marked a dramatic rise reaching to peak values nearly 7 and 5 metric tonnes in 1997. After which, both maintained a constant behaviour, with Italy remained higher by 2 metric tonnes in comparison to Portugal.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 78
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town a and b in two years 1960 and 2010 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thereafter,
...ly 1 metric tonnes in Portugal in 1967. Thereafter both marked a dramatic rise reaching to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71806167401 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44998882141 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537444933921 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0834528932 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.875 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186045357408 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901279138884 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767342273513 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138374821047 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817488121975 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.