The line graph illustrates shifts in the number of tonnes of CO2 released per person each year in four nations from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, while the United Kingdom and Sweden's populations tend to emit less and less carbon dioxide, Italy and Portugal saw an opposite trend. In addition, the figure for this phenomenon is highest in the UK throughout the year, compared to other countries.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1967, approximately 11 metric tonnes of CO2 per person were witnessed in the UK, followed by Sweden, at 8,5 tonnes. The quantity of tonnes in Italy and Portugal was 4 tonnes and more than 1 tonne respectively. There was a sharp decrease in the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK to 9 tonnes in 2007.
The rest of the nations grew dramatically in the year 1977. Sweden jumped enormously from 8,5 tonnes to more than 10 tonnes in ten years but later fell significantly to around 5 tonnes in 2007. There was a rapid growth to nearly 8 tonnes in average CO2 emissions per people in Italy, surpassing Sweden at the later of the year 1987. Finally, Portugal increased considerably to 5,5 tonnes in 2007.
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 78
- The chart below shows rite expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK in 2004 11
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65412885897 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4159195313 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261597933478 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109157226914 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745580664828 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161875485201 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255396708641 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.