The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010
The line graph compares four different countries regarding carbon dioxide emissions that they released over a period of 35 years, commencing from 1975. Units are measured in metric tonnes of each person.
In general, there was an upward tendency in the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by four different countries between 1975 and 2010. Additionally, Singapore produced much higher carbon dioxide emissions in comparison with China, Thailand and Vietnam, and also witnessed the most considerable fluctuation over the mentioned period.
The figure of carbon emissions released by Singapore started at around 11 in 1975 and then reached the peak at over 14 in 1990, with a substantial fluctuation. Thereafter, it dropped significantly to 11 in the final year; however, predominated over the period shown
Beginning at around 1 in the initial year, while the amount of carbon emissions produced by Vietnam stabilized and grew marginally over the mentioned period, that of Thailand witnessed a considerable rise by 4 at the end of the period. Similarly, China released at about 2 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide in the first year, after which the emissions grew threefold in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 84
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 84
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japan between 1980 and 2015 84
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity in Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32085561497 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87673696142 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.372721857 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278197828445 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146261620245 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115674837659 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187449913138 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894904388729 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.