The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.
Given in the line graph is the illustration of how much 3 types of spread were consumed over a 26-year period between 1981 and 2007. All the units are measured in grams.
Overall, what is striking from the graph is that low fat and reduced spreads saw a dramatic increase, while the others went down over the time period covered by the graph. At the beginning of the period, butter was the most popular spread, which was replaced by margarine from 1991 to 2001, and following this, low fat and reduced spreads became the most widely used spread in the final years.
In 1981, the amount of butter and margarine started at 140 and about 85 grams respectively. Following this, the figure for butter increased and then significantly went down to 100 in 1991, but the opposite pattern was recorded for the figure for maragine, which is equal to that for butter in 1991. After 1991, butter and margarine traded places and gradually declined to under 60 grams in 2007.
On the other hand, having only begun in 1996 at about 10, the figure for low fat and reduced spreads then witnessed a rapid rise to peak at over 80. Eventually, the figure steadily dropped to about 65 at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58411214953 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30707233487 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1003814186 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180535858161 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746451999956 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758942616647 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114076525303 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789369461519 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.