The graph illustrates changes in the amount of beef, lamb, chicken and fish consumed in a particular European country from 1979 to 2004.
In 1979, beef was the most popular food among chicken, beef, lamb and fish with about 225 gram per person weekly. After plummeting in the two next years, reached the highest level in the 25 year period around 275 grams per person per week. Throughout the period, the amount of consumption rose and fell frequency and at least gained the lowest level of consumption of about 100 grams per person weekly in 2004.
Initially, there was a similar quantity in the consumption of chicken and lamb with around 50 grams in 1979. The chicken consumption dealt with to fluctuate during 25 years while gained the highest level of consumption in 2004 around 250 grams. The consumption of lamb, on the other hand, after descending trend and experiencing an erratic behaviour, met about 55 grams per person every week.
The fish consumption, finally, were eaten with the lowest rate of consumption. Although in 1979, put in the high popularity with around 55 grams, after that year, it experienced the lowest rate of fluctuations and in the whole of the period remained almost stable.
Overall, during this period, chicken became far more popular compared to lamb and beef, whereas the consumption of fish remained constant with the lowest rate of popularity.
- During the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a Dramatic change to people lives. It's positive or negative development. Give your opinion and example 89
- Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing Why do you think it is happening How can this problem be solved 87
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends.Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 84
- Many elderly people are no long er looked after by their families but are put in care home or nursing home. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ken, beef, lamb and fish with about 225 gram per person weekly. After plummeting in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...bout 55 grams per person every week. The fish consumption, finally, were eaten w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, whereas, while, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02586206897 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56583933833 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512931034483 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3623978675 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115823422392 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593089967349 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051056226057 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08444106475 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577535470633 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.