The graph shows the four different kinds of fish and meat such as fish, chicken, lamb, and beef were consuming through the people who lived in European country on the period between 1979 to 2004.
In general, chicken, in term of the amount of consumption, constantly increased, while the others decreased, with the trend of fish remaining marginal toward the other figures.
The amount of chicken eaten by the people climbed by 100 to 250 in 2004. This rise has shifted chicken to be the most popular food for the last 15 years of the given period, which replaced the position of beef.
By contrast, the figure of beef, lamb, and fish went down during the 25 year period. At the early given years, beef was the most favorable food in the country. Regardless of a sharp rise between 1983 and 1985, the figure fell to hit its lowest point at 100 by 2004. Looking more closely at lamb and fish, there is a striking similarity between the quantity of the intake of lamb and fish, with the amount of consumption falling down from 150 and 60 in 1979 to 60 and 40 in the end of the given period, respectively.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison whre relevant. 75
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 73
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011. 67
- the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort 56
- Some people agree that teachers should be strict with their students; others believe that teachers with friendly approach will achieve better results. Discuss and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53233830846 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32239743867 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6774257859 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17220716885 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713282140525 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994832600518 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114805713902 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123496414486 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.