This graph illustrates every European citizen’s gram consumption of fish, chicken, beef and lamb per week. At the beginning the consumption of meats declined, except chicken. But consumption of fish was the lonest one. It regularly was about 50 grams per week.
The second low consumption was for lamb. We can see that from the beginning the line has downward sloping. Beef consumption was more than chicken consumption and beef consumption increased in 80 years and was between 200 and 250 grams. After 1989, beef consumption started to decrease when consumption of chicken increased from this year. In 25 years chicken consumption had upward sloping, it means consumption of this type of meat constantly increasing . And chicken that was in the second place, started being the most consumed one and reached 250 grams per week. To conclude, we can say that in 25 years the interests of European citizen’s have charged. People started consuming more chicken than beef and lamb. However, the fish consumption didn’t change.
- Some people are born to be the leaders others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Writing task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in give Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... this type of meat constantly increasing . And chicken that was in the second plac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, as for, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26506024096 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89710227999 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0561621438 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.2307692308 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.7692307692 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166017824133 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731827665474 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577230342562 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154829616303 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247650375347 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.