The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ber of male and female students studying at university from 1985-2015. The gra...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Woman
...s studying very less than man students. woman pupils were only around 1000 and male s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an female pupils.they were around 5000. After that in 1990 they both only increased. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...2006 they both were around 27000. so in 2010 woman students was increased an...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ents was increased and they were 33000. but man pupils was around 34000. Sure male ...
^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e 27000. The graph shows in 2015 female didnt grow In conclusion female pupils d...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he graph shows in 2015 female didnt grow In conclusion female pupils didnt grow ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t grow In conclusion female pupils didnt grow and feom 1985 to 2010 male and wom...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...5 to 2010 male and woman students grew. but the graph shows that from 2010 female s...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95364238411 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08239975866 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 66.0 106.607317073 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437086092715 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5481637343 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.5384615385 112.824112599 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.6153846154 22.9334400587 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295344024203 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134351100877 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176314861641 0.0843802449381 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291561793637 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198931493178 0.0819641961636 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.25 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.75 8.06136585366 71% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 40.7170731707 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.