The line graph depicts the average number of tourists visiting a specific Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total number of visitors had inclined during the whole time period. Additionally, visitors who study on the island had dropped at the at of the time period. However, tourists who studying on cruise ships had fluctuated at the beginning of the period.
According to visitors who studying on cruise ships, it had a slight increase about 0. 3 million in 2011, while it had slipped miserly around 0. 3 million in 2012. In addition, this was rose from 0. 3 million to a million in 2014. In 2015, tourists who studying on cruise ships was accounting approximately 1. 3 million, when it grew considerably about 2 million.
In terms of tourists who studying on the island have similar numbers about 0. 7 million in 2010 and 2011, where it had a gradual growth around 1, 5 million in 2014. It had fallen down almost 1. 3 million in 2016 although, it had risen slightly to around 1. 5 million in 2017. The estimated number of visitors was inclined consistently and it had reached a peak of about 3. 5 million tourists in 2017.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that children should be encouraged to play outdoor games that require physical activit instead of playing computer games in the home Do you agree or disagree 73
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66502463054 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66196796197 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453201970443 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8820504727 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 52.6111111111 112.824112599 47% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.2777777778 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.72222222222 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121663438684 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512856253789 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783850744313 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122616339455 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118429892246 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.2 13.2329268293 47% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.62 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.