The below chart illustrates how many people turn up to a particular Caribbean Island from 2010 to 2017.
It is apparent that despite some fluctuations, the number of travelers visiting this area increased throughout this period. In addition, the figure for visitors staying on cruise ships overtook those on the island between 2016 to 2017.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 2010, the total of travelers who came here was 1 million. Then, there was a sharp increase to 2,7 million travelers in 2015 but later remained stable from 2015 to 2016, standing at 3,5 million in 2017.
In terms of visitors who came here, the number of people staying on cruise ships was less threefold than those on the island in 2010. However, after declining in 2012, visitors staying on cruise ships rose enormously to 2 million in 2017, surpassing those on the island in the later year 2015. In addition, there was a fluctuation in the number of travelers staying on the island, then this figure accounted for 1,5 million in 2017.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the table below gives information about changes in models of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure accounted for 1,5 million in 2017.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53275038047 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.104414938 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160484219041 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821305969874 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546498441135 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116868355468 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619850849427 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.