The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph breaks down data on visitors of the Caribbean island over a period of 7 years. It is unmistakable that there was a reducing trend for total visitors and visitors who staying on cruise ships, despite a slightly climbing figures for visitors who stayed on the island.

On the areas of total visitors and visitors staying on cruise ships, one sees a trend of a surge. The pattern was first demonstrated by total visitors, which experience a major increase from only 1 million to 3.5 millions people in 2017, a gain of 2.5 million people. Matters developed in a similar way for visitors who stayed on a cruise ship, as this area had decisively grown to 2 million people by 2017 from its number in 2010.

There was a different course of events for numbers of visitors staying on island because of the fact that this area marginally gained. One sees an increasing trend in a period of 2010-2014 as shown by growth to 1.5 million people by 2014. There was a fluctuation in regards to a period of 2015-2017, which totaled a recovery to 1.5 million people between 2015 and 2017.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... 2.5 million people. Matters developed in a similar way for visitors who stayed on a cruise shi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...r numbers of visitors staying on island because of the fact that this area marginally gained. One sees ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...eople by 2014. There was a fluctuation in regards to a period of 2015-2017, which totaled a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63402061856 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55776603193 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.158473653 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902970575086 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049452963831 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352615152811 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695877508759 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190573635873 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.