The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the total amount of visitors who traveled in Caribbean island during the given period (2010-2017).

Overall,it can be seen that total number of tourists rose considerably,those staying on cruise ships increased in particular, overtaking staying on the island itself, which underwent a more moderate increase.

The number of visitors staying on cruise ships started from 0.25 million in 2010. And rose to 0.5 million in 2011. However,the amount of tourists again fell to 0.25 in 2012. It can be seen significantly increase from 0.5 to 2 millions between 2013 and 2017. The quantity of visitors staying on island was at around 0.75 million in 2010 and it remain steady in 2021. Indications rose to 1.25 million people in 2012 and reached 1.5 million in 2003. The indications not changed from 2013 to 2015 years. The minimal amount of total tourists was 1 million in 2010 and steady increased through the years. The number of total visitors was 2 million in 2013, 2.5 million in 2014, 2.75 million in 2015 and 2016, and reached 3.5 million in 2017.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...g the given period 2010-2017. Overall,it can be seen that total number of touris...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , those
...tal number of tourists rose considerably,those staying on cruise ships increased in pa...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...And rose to 0.5 million in 2011. However,the amount of tourists again fell to 0.25 i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
...s at around 0.75 million in 2010 and it remain steady in 2021. Indications rose to 1.2...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and steady increased through the years. The number of total visitors was 2 million ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95027624309 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68143125272 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497237569061 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8491958526 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4545454545 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130030470533 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560079899337 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458042703039 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111010429843 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361278442459 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.