The line graph demonstrates the number of visitors visited on the Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. The scale is in millions of visitors.
Overall, it can be apparently observed that the number of tourists was increased throughout the period.
To begin with, in the initial year, people preferred to live on island which was overtaken by staying on a cruise ship at end of the period. Next, in the year 2010, around 0.7 million visitors took a visit to the island, and staying there remained steady till 2011. Furthermore, in two subsequent years visit to the island was spiked and reached 1.5 million tourists at a time. Afterward, there was no change witnessed in the next three years. However, in 2016, visitors decreased and accounted for 1.3 million and again it set back its original value of 1.5 million at the end of the year.
Moreover, people who favor staying on cruise ware negligible at the beginning which fluctuate in till 2013. Then, it was accelerated and most of the people preferred to stay on a cruise ships for the remaining years. In the end, it was overtaken by cruise ship and almost 2 million people love to live on a cruise ship, in 2017. Beside this, in the initial year, total visitors recorded for 1 million which grew rapidly 3 times more in 7 years and in the end it claimed for 3.5 million
- These days many people leave their country to work abroad and take their family with them Do you think benefits of this outweigh disadvantages in terms of family development
- The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 198o and 2002 Summarise information and make comparison which relevant 56
- Some people think that children should be taught at school to recycle materials and avoid waste Other people believe that children should be taught this at home Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 56
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they are received from employers 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ists was increased throughout the period To begin with in the initial year people...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...of 15 million at the end of the year Moreover people who favor staying on cruise ware...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, however, moreover, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52966101695 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43290827204 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 236.0 22.4926829268 1049% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1069.0 112.824112599 947% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 236.0 22.9334400587 1029% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 63.0 5.23603664747 1203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103295326359 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103295326359 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10625045956 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100190208864 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 117.9 13.2329268293 891% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -151.14 61.2550243902 -247% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 93.0 10.3012195122 903% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.47 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.88 8.06136585366 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 96.4 10.9970731707 877% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 11.0658536585 840% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ists was increased throughout the period To begin with in the initial year people...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...of 15 million at the end of the year Moreover people who favor staying on cruise ware...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, however, moreover, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52966101695 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43290827204 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 236.0 22.4926829268 1049% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1069.0 112.824112599 947% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 236.0 22.9334400587 1029% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 63.0 5.23603664747 1203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103295326359 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103295326359 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10625045956 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100190208864 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 117.9 13.2329268293 891% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -151.14 61.2550243902 -247% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 93.0 10.3012195122 903% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.47 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.88 8.06136585366 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 96.4 10.9970731707 877% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 11.0658536585 840% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.