The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about the percentage of part-time workers in different countries of the United Kingdom between 1980 and 2010 is illustrated in a bar chart.
Overall, the percentage of people who work in particular-time in wales was most popular. However, other counterparts showed some changes.
In 1980, the figure for Wales' part-time workers was most common compared to others, being the highest level to around less than a third followed by England's ones. Meanwhile, the proportion of those in Northern Ireland and Scotland only took up with just under a fifth.
By 2010, The percentage of all countries had experienced upward trends, except Northern Ireland. Also, Wales' ones had broken a record as the highest percentage to approximately more than a third, while the part-time workers in Scotland had a significant incline to almost a fifth. When it came to Northern Ireland, the workers had accounted for considerably the lowest proportion to just a minority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | hellocacban | view | |
| 2022-08-05 | kaushalpatel569 | 55 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | phuongquynh79 | 47 | view |
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The charts below show the proportion of expenditure by students on average at one university in 2000 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 96
- In some companies a typical working week has been reduced to 30 hours Do the advantages outweigh the demerits 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, third, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95555703341 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7849778629 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227629452982 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100111398805 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103420832227 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158705101916 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116135185709 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.