The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
The multi line graph illustrates the pollution level of smoke and sulphur dioxide in London from 1600 to 2000.The data calibrated in micrograms per cubic metres.
Have a look on the pollution levels of both smoke and sulphur dioxide, in the initial year the former was incline with 250 micrograms per cubic metres whereas, near around 50 micrograms per cubic metres recorded the level of smoke. The level of sulphar dioxide which was doubled consider in 1650 as compare to the first year however, slight inclination observed by the level of smoke. In the time period of 100 years, between 1750 to1800 years both upsurged with the difference of 500 micrograms per cubic metres.
By having a glance on the other time periods,smoke level accumulated exactly 300 micrograms per cubic metres in 1850 while, the level of sulphar dioxide touched the peak point just under one thousand micrograms per cubic metres but till 1900 both were followed declining trend. There was some zig-zag pattern could be noticed in 1950 to 2000 and at last it stagnant on the same position.
Overall, there was a higher level of sulphar dioxide with the comparison of smoke in the atmosphere over the time period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- The Chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012. 78
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S from 1960 to 2011. 56
- Now a days, parents too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason for doing this. Is this a negative or positive development. 22
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.water use selected countries 2000. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...hur dioxide in London from 1600 to 2000.The data calibrated in micrograms per cubic...
^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , smoke
...aving a glance on the other time periods,smoke level accumulated exactly 300 microgram...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93034825871 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44949984767 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8714268082 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181952120668 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940107746057 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855039386394 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131285924464 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993110219637 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.