The provided line graph illustrates the percentage of four distinct recycled materials in a specific nation during the period bewteen 1982 and 2010
Overall, there was an upward trend in the proportion of recycled materials in all categories. While paper and cardboard constituted the highest figure over the examined period, the lowest one was witnessed in plastics.
In 1982, the percentage of paper and cardboard ranked 1st with approximately 65%, which was 15% higher than that of glass containers recorded in the same year. In the next 12 years, the figure for paper and cardboard climbed considerably to reach its peak of 80% in 1994, and then it underwent a gradual fall to about 70% at the end of the period. Meanwhile, the proportion of glass containers bottomed at 40% in 1990, prior to a recovering to 60% in 2010.
Alumininium cans beginned to be recycled in 1986, which was earlier than the recycling application on plastics 4 years. Additionally, the starting point in two types of recycled materials were relatively identical at around 5%. Over a 24-year period, a sharp growth to 45% was seen in the proportion of alumininium cans, while the figure for plastics experienced a slight increase to 10% in 2010.
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today s life while others think that history is a valuable source of information Disciuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Essay 6 Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 84
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 78
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games why do they do this Is this positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87852001103 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590243902439 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.96518509 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199255674593 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084275835524 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878325899691 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134524436273 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756650745972 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.