A glance at the provided line graph illustrates how many goods were transported in the UK during the period of 28 years from 1974 to 2002 by four kinds of transport.
This is such a clear-cut evidence from the provided information that 3 out of 4 modes of transport including road, water, and pipeline were used more while the other one seemed to stay constant through this period.
To begin with, it can be seen clearly that the number of goods transported by road and pipeline fluctuated before reaching a peak of nearly 100 million tonnes and over 20 million tonnes respectively in 2002. After 28 years, road was still the most prevalent choice for transportation and pipeline continued rank last.
On the other hand, in 1974, water and rail were chosen to transport goods at the same rate (approximately 40 million tonnes for each) until 1978. Both of them experienced significant fluctuation during the rest period. It has to be noted that the usage of rail hit a trough of about 30 million tonnes between 1994 and 1998. Then, it returned to the same position as 1974 in 2002. In addition, the quantities of goods using water went up considerably to about 70 million tonnes in 2002 with a slightly decrease in 1998.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 61
- Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing Discuss the causes and solutions 68
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 84
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 489, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...to about 70 million tonnes in 2002 with a slightly decrease in 1998.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, then, while, as to, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7476635514 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63902463872 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61214953271 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0650115922 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285482606367 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109898363169 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928270592076 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177798149049 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102991699379 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.