The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph depicts the amounts of commodities which were transported by 4 various modes of transport such as; road, water, rail as well as pipeline in the UK from 1974 to 2002.

Overall, the figures of virtually all modes of transportation increased significantly, except for rail that did not experience perciptable alterations by the end of the period.

It is clear that the vast amount of goods was transported by road at roughly 70 million tones in1974. However, the quantitiy of commodities carried by pipeline had the lowest figure with 4 million tones in 1974. Moreover, it is worth to note that the commodities carried by water and rail which had almost the same figure with just about 40 million tones.

By 2001, it was witnessed that the amount of goods up to 100 million tones that was transported by road. Likewise, the trend for water showed exponential rise by the end of the period to 60 million, whereas the data of rail remained steady in 1974 figure. What is more, the quantitity of commodities delivered by pipeline underwent remarkable alterations throughtout the period. That is to say that the figure for this mode of transportation rose almost four times more to 22 million in 2002 than it had in 1974.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-04 mitss99 67 view
2021-07-04 mitss99 67 view
Essays by user Odiljon :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h were transported by 4 various modes of transport such as; road, water, rail as ...
^^
Line 7, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more to 22 million in 2002 than it had in 1974.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, moreover, well, whereas, except for, such as, as well as, what is more, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84433962264 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81961468096 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9805929216 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 5.23603664747 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179155739382 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806217908512 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704239935763 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125074396814 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650779132174 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.