The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.
» Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates, the ratio of smoking in Someland per thousand people from both genders during 1960 to 2000.
Overall, smoking habits among women were escalating as compared to man over the given period. The number of male smokers were decreased as half after four decades.
As is observed, the highest number of smokers was males at the beginning period such as 600 out of 1000 people. While, following the years there was a dramatic decrease in male smokers reached 500 in 1975. After ten years, the trend again fell into 400 in turn, females account for 300 per 1000 people in 1985. Moreover, the account for smoking habits in males remained almost steadily for five years which later plummeted to below 300 at the end of the period.
Regarding smoking in females was mere 100 at the starting period which is doubled after five years and relatively stable for the following years. While during 1975 there was a significant growth in female smokers which is more than 300. The number smokers for the next consecutive tears remained constant up to 1990 and dipped into 200 by the end of the period. Furthermore, the year 2000 smokers ratio difference was approximately 50 per 1000 people in both genders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | Lananhtranhanoi | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, email, or telephone calls.How far you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes inannual spending by a pparticular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparison where relevent. 56
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... period such as 600 out of 1000 people. While, following the years there was a drama...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...600 out of 1000 people. While, following the years there was a dramatic decrease ...
^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...atively stable for the following years. While during 1975 there was a significant gro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86602870813 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38048736276 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9361312279 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4545454545 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174553477183 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696544111345 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075882369923 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125534431292 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903002818711 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.