“The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.”
The line graph compares the number of people in terms of smoking in Someland over a period of 40 years.
As can be seen from the graph, the total number of people in Someland who smoke on an annual basis fall between 1960 and 2000 and the most dramatic decrease was seen in men.
In 1960, while only 100 in 1000 women smoked, this figure increased considerably to the number of over 300 in the next 15 years. From 1980 to 1990, there was a slight drop in the number of smoking women but over the course 10 years starting from 1990, it fell dramatically from 300 to 200 people.Moreover, the rate of smoking among men declined steadily. While in 1960 there were about 600, the figure for the later year being nearly 300. The most outstanding reduction was seen from 1990 to 1995 with 100 people.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-04-10 | Ulugbek7719 | 56 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 61
- Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 61
- Advertising campaigns on TV that are targeted at children should be banned.To what extent to you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated in the same as as adults who commit crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ell dramatically from 300 to 200 people.Moreover, the rate of smoking among men declined...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 651.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30482776251 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605442176871 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 179.1 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1444572212 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223061081942 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107054153302 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644758677436 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166396496579 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291713279618 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.