The graph below shows the town of brain dell and local area in 1800 , 1900and 2000
The three maps delineate how the town of Brindell and its surroundings had altered over three centuries from 1800 to 2000.
Overall, the area of Brindell tremendously changed over the given period and transformed from an agricultural place to a residential and industrial hub.
Initially, in 1800, the four areas were separated by river stour(which is in the center). Brindell town was situated in the SouthWest of the river. There were two agricultural zones: farmland for crops and animals in North and East of brindell respectively. A large chunk of the area was occupied by woodland at the NorthEast corner. In the following century, a few noticeable changes had taken place. Mainly, the entire grazing area had been converted into an industrial zone in the upper half while in the lower half, a new Bun Hill village was constructed.
In 2000, drastic changes can be observed in the area as Brindell town expanded in size (almost double). The farmland as well as the forest area had shrunk in size to make way for a new Bun Hill park. Also, many more industries were opened and the overall size of bun hill was augmented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the numbers of cases of diarrhoea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of adults according to age and gender who do not any do physical activity in Australia summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses of the world s fuel resources to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86010362694 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70397823498 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8459247613 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137773308984 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557893373533 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485817064774 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864414120874 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294685124533 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.