The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.

The line graph gives information about per capita consumption of four popular meat namely beef, pork, broilers and turkey in the US over a 57-year period, from 1955 to 2012. Units are measured in pounds.

Overall, it is clear that beef most popular meat of four type of meat and turkey was by far least popular. Although after 2009, broilers was more popular than beef, with figures surpassing those for beef.

Between 1955 and 1978, the consumption of beef and broilers saw a dramatically rise, reaching 80 and 28 respectively. In spite of some fluctuation in pork consumption, this figure fell from 50 in 1995 to 40 in 1978 while amount of turkey consumption remained below 10 pounds.

In 2008, consumption of beef and broilers was equal at 60 before dropping to 50 in 2012 while consumption of pork and turkey was 40 and 12 repetition. it is expected that these figures approximately constant at these levels for December 2012.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-09 Estriper view
Essays by user mohammad.iraf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...he consumption of beef and broilers saw a dramatically rise, reaching 80 and 28 respectively. In sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rk and turkey was 40 and 12 repetition. it is expected that these figures approxim...
^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at these levels for December 2012.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71293199325 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9156148738 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937020286569 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378919360647 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500669457939 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592347336558 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416968240596 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.