The pie charts depict the information about the five various ( oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power, nuclear power) sources of energy for USA in the year 1980 and 1990.
Overall, it can be said that highest proportion of energy was obtainted from oil and least percentage of energy is produced from hydroelectric power in the both years.
A close look on the graphs make it lucid that 42% of energy was gained from oil in 1980 which was decreased to 9% in 1990. The ratio of energy produced from natural gas was just above a quarter in 1980 which was declined slightly to 25% after 10 years. The same proportion of energy was produced from hydroelectric power between 1980 and 1990 that was 5%.
The energy produced from coal was recorded to just below a quarter in 1980 which was increased by 5% in 1990. The percentage of energy produce from nuclear power was 5% in 1980 which was increased slightly and get doubled in the year 1990.
- Leaders and directors is an organization normally elder people. Some people think that young people is more better. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- q The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below You should write at least 150 words You 67
- Students at schools and universities learn far more from lessons with teachers than others sources such as internet and tv to what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 61
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the information about the five various oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric po...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r between 1980 and 1990 that was 5%. The energy produced from coal was recorded ...
^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...1980 which was increased by 5% in 1990. The percentage of energy produce from nucle...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64880952381 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43118877401 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2020407337 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227215633539 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140745876432 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570547434531 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159136515795 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640336028062 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.