The chart compares the amount of coffee produced in four different nations, over a period of 20 years.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the production of coffee in Brazil, Indonesia, and Vietnam increased, except for Colombia. In addition, Brazil produced coffee the most, while the least figure was recorded in Vietnam in all four years.
Turing to the chart for the detail, in 1990, the amount of coffee produced stood at 0, 7 million tones in Brazil, in comparison with 0, 6 million tones in Colombia. During the following 20 years, the figure for Brazil grew dramatically to end the period, at 1, 9 million tones. By contrast, there was a significant decrease in the coffee production in Colombia to 0, 3 million tones in the last years.
In terms of the other countries, the productions of coffee in Indonesia and Vietnam were 0, 2 and 0, 1 million tones respectively. By 1995, these figures stayed relatively unchanged before rising considerably to finish the period at 0, 4 and 0, 3 million tones respectively in 2010.
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8202247191 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80750522622 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6022957839 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131463553952 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674168566959 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344755586001 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877317652169 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00662263377335 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.