The graph compares the information about coffee production in 4 different nations (Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and Vietnam) between 1990 and 2010.
In general, it can be seen that for all figures the trend was upward except for Colombia. Additionally, the coffee production in Brazil was highest, while Vietnam recorded the lowest figure shown on the chart.
Turning to the chart for details, the amount of coffee production in Brazil started at 0.7 million tonnes in the first year, compared to 0.6 million tonnes in Colombia. In the last year, the figure for Brazil's coffee production increased significantly reaching a peak of 1.9 million tonnes. In contrast, there was a considerable fall in the production of coffee in Colombia hitting the lowest point at about 0.3 million tonnes.
Looking at the others, Indonesia produced nearly 0.2 million tonnes in 1990, which was double that of Vietnam (0.1 million tonnes). In the next 5 years, these figures for Indonesia and Vietnam remained relatively unchanged before growing significantly reaching 0.4 million tonnes and 0.3 million tonnes respectively.
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, except for, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35632183908 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73886604956 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7567559344 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192035089628 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111359059183 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138787381756 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167786261595 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172917192671 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.