The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph gives informations about the yearly earnings of three bakeries Robbie’s Bakery, Bernie’s Buns and Lovely Loaves in London from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, the annual earnings of Robbie’s Bakery and Bernie’s Buns increased moderately during the period from 2000 to 2010. On the other hand, the Lovely Loaves was significantly decrease in the same time. The biggest change was the Bernie’s Bun: in 2000, it was the lowest income but it had a highest earnings of all.
In 2000, the yearly income of Bernie’s Buns was 20000 pounds and the Robbie’s Bakery was over 50000 pounds. Although the annual income of Lovely Loaves was the highest in the year 2000: more than 80000 pounds, there was sharply fell to 60000 pounds in the 2005. In the same time, the yearly earnings of Bernie’s Bun saw a rapid growth . The earning of Robbie’s Bakery remained from 2000 to 2005.
In the year 2005, the annual earnings of Lovely Loaves was the highest: over 60000 pounds. But from 2005 to 2010, the Lovely Loaves’s yearly income experienced an enormous reduction to 40000 pounds. In the late 2005, the annual earnings of Robbie’s Bakery increased dramatically and went up to 100000 pounds in 2010. On the contrary, there was a moderate climb over 60000 pounds and it was the biggest annual income in three bakeries in the last year.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y Loaves in London from 2000 to 2010. Overall, the annual earnings of Robbie&...
^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...010. Overall, the annual earnings of Robbie's Bakery and Bernie's B...
^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...nd, the Lovely Loaves was significantly decrease in the same time. The biggest change wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...00, it was the lowest income but it had a highest earnings of all. In 2000, t...
^
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... income but it had a highest earnings of all. In 2000, the yearly income of Be...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but it had a highest earnings of all. In 2000, the yearly income of Bernie&apo...
^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...00 pounds. Although the annual income of Lovely Loaves was the highest in the yea...
^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In the same time, the yearly earnings of Bernie's Bun saw a rapid growth . T...
^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of Bernie's Bun saw a rapid growth . The earning of Robbie's Bakery rem...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s;s Bakery remained from 2000 to 2005. In the year 2005, the annual earnings of...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In the year 2005, the annual earnings of Lovely Loaves was the highest: over 6000...
^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In the late 2005, the annual earnings of Robbie's Bakery increased dramatica...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0480349345 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80215957766 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419213973799 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5587926381 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166533699403 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886703702533 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678054096544 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147679066101 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657389778887 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.