The bar graph demonstrates the measurement of manufacturing capacity of oil of six different Gulf countries from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that all countries had shown a similar trend that was increasing except Qatar. Among the countries Saudi Arabia was in first place in terms of production all around the periods, while Qatar was in last.
According to the graph, in 1990, Saudi Arabia produced over 8 millions of barrels per day which was far higher than others, while Iran and UAE were able to manufacture over 2 millions. The capability of other two countries was 2 millions of barrels per day. After five years, every country upgraded their production but not more than 0.5 millions of barrels each day, whereas UAE could not raise their productivity.
In 2005, Saudi Arabia production changed significantly, it climbed to almost 13 and after five years it went to 15 millions of barrels per day. In these two consecutive periods the amount of manufacture was not increased for Iran and Qatar, while their production was 4 and 1 millions respectively. In the case of the other three countries the production rose but the amount was almost the same and they produced 3 and 3.7 millions of barrels per day in these two years respectively.
- Some people believe that bicycles are the best mode of transport in the cities while others disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both views and give your opinion 73
- Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages 82
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...ph, in 1990, Saudi Arabia produced over 8 millions of barrels per day which was far higher th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...e capability of other two countries was 2 millions of barrels per day. After five years, ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...ed their production but not more than 0.5 millions of barrels each day, whereas UAE could not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...most 13 and after five years it went to 15 millions of barrels per day. In these two consecuti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tion was 4 and 1 millions respectively. In the case of the other three countries t...
^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
...most the same and they produced 3 and 3.7 millions of barrels per day in these two years resp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90366972477 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7422791816 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536697247706 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0558823513 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125615958726 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674114125906 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640428620287 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108688845039 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798493056772 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.