The bar graph depicts the estimated production capacity of petroleum in terms of category of five different Gulf nations in 1990, 2000, 2005, and 2010.
Overall, Saudi Arabia has the predominant number of oil production in four different years. On the contrary, Qatar has the lowest capacity of oil production in four separate years. Exclusive of Qatar, five other countries saw upward trend in the oil production capacity from in four separate years.
To be specific, in terms of category of Iran, the number of oil production rise from nearly 3 million in 1990 to merely over 4 millions of barrels per day in 2010. It is also interesting to note that the number of oil production capacity in UAE in 1990 is equivalent to that of 2000, standing at approximately 2.5 millions of barrels per day. Equally important is that Qatar experienced a fluctuation throughout the four different years, accounting below 1 millions of barrels per day.
Last but not least, the most striking point is that the most superior number of oil production fall into the category of Saudi Arabia, from below 9 million in 1990 to over 14 million of barrels per day in 2010.
- The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You shoul 73
- Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior.Do you agree or disag 78
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...nearly 3 million in 1990 to merely over 4 millions of barrels per day in 2010. It is also int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...at of 2000, standing at approximately 2.5 millions of barrels per day. Equally important is t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...mately 2.5 millions of barrels per day. Equally important is that Qatar experienced a f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
... four different years, accounting below 1 millions of barrels per day. Last but not least,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86868686869 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70607172884 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479797979798 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6579121992 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186349060488 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102986720109 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568538782509 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133914243693 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522636212856 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.