The graph shows the number of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature.
The graph is illustrating the number of UK individuals who dieting as a vegetarian from 1980 to 2020. It is drawn as a grid model to illustrate detailed points and numbers.
From the graph, it is observed that, between 1980 to 1995, there was a slight increase and decrease number of vegetarians, but in the big picture the total number were constants. Formerly, since in 1996, the numbers are started to increase inch by inch until it reached doubled amount at the end of 2000. However, this increasing trend did not last for a long time. In the next 5 years, vegetarian dieters’ quantity declined moderately and by 2005, it turned to the point where it was in 1995. This inclination continued until 2015.
Another interesting movement observed from the chart was a sharp increase in vegetarians from 2015 to 2020. The total number reached approximately 900000 in 2020. Comparing to the growth that happened in the 2000s this growth was almost 5 times higher than when it was in former years.
- The graphs below show the trends in three boys and girls names which are currently popular in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- University should receive same financial support as classes. 73
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 70
- Discussion about whether dinosaurs are endotherms or not? 88
- Many people say that only way to guarantee getting a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the abov 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8023255814 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68025147549 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6428345468 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125484031695 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520733939486 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741611429792 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100363529051 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572228025343 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.