The line graph illustrates shifts in the percentage of people visiting the movie theater once or more than once a month during a 19-year starting from 1984.
Overall, people tend to like going to the cinema, in spite of some fluctuations. In addition, there were more people in age 15 to 24 visiting the cinemas, compared to others.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1984, over 15% of people between 15 to 24 years old went to the movie theater once a month or more, as opposed to a mere 2% of visitors aged 35% and over. During the given period, the figure for visitors between 15 to 24 years old grew consistently to nearly 35% in 1992, before fluctuating dramatically standing at 50% at the end of the year 2003. Meanwhile, a slight rise was witnessed in people aged 35 and over, at approximately 20% in 2003.
Another point is 10% of people from 7 to 14 years old visited the cinema in the first year which was about twice higher as visitors between 25 to 34 years old. Afterward, both figures increased erratically for 19 years and stopped at nearly 30%.
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 67
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...first year which was about twice higher as visitors between 25 to 34 years old. Af...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51030927835 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57106974184 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3829194191 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182722126713 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875105982006 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802829313956 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130829814512 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721011817114 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.