The line graph illustrates shifts in the percentage of people visiting the movie theater once or more than once a month during a 19-year starting from 1984.
It is clear that people tend to like going to the cinema, despite some fluctuations. In addition, compared to other age groups, more individuals between the ages of 15 and 24 visited the theaters.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1984, over 15% of people between 15 to 24 years old went to the movie theater once a month or more, as opposed to a mere 2% of visitors aged 35% and over. During the given period, the figure for visitors between 15 to 24 years old grew consistently to nearly 35% in 1992, before fluctuating dramatically standing at 50% at the end of the year 2003. Meanwhile, a slight rise was witnessed in people aged 35 and over, at approximately 20% in 2003.
Another point is that 10% of those aged 7 to 14 went to the movies in their first year, which is twice as many as those aged 25 to 34. Afterward, both figures increased erratically for 19 years and stopped at nearly 30%.
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows rite expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK in 2004 11
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47692307692 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58392339129 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2344645994 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206920551004 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936053047488 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864630580773 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142050103327 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761784312647 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.