The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The presented table indicates how the income and expenditure for cuisine and costumes of a middle-class household in a certain UK urban areas changed, while the pie chart compares five items in terms of the percentages they occupied in the entire spending. Both data refers to 2010 and 2013.
Overall, opposite trends were witness in the modifications of the family’s salary and expense. In addition, Meat and Fish was the sector which changed the most considerably.
Turning into detail, between 2010 and 2013, the income decreased significantly from £29000 to £25000. By contrast, starting £14000, Food and Clothes cost gained slightly to £15000 over the same period.
Regarding to the pie chart, in 2010, in comparison to Dairy products, which accounted for 15% of total expenditure, the figure for food and vegetable was faintly higher, with 20%. At the end of the period, while the former grew gradually to 20%, the latter expanded remarkably to exactly 35%, occupying the biggest proportion among five counterparts. On the other hand, starting at 22% and 25%, respectively, Clothes as well as Meat and Fish shared the same diminishing level of 10% in 2013. Meanwhile, Other food and drinks was the only item the number of which remained unchanged during the stage.
- People living in large cities face several problems What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller town 89
- The bar chart shows the number of hours worked by men women per week in Australia in 2007 Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people say that the experiences a child has before starting school have the most influence on their future life Others say that experiences as a teenager especially at school are more influential Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 80
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7689469673 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644230769231 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1797262582 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132943554452 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499499257723 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036685183303 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763652100476 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386644215646 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.