The line graph provides information regarding the quantity of coffee exports over three different parts of the world namely Brazil, Colombia and Costa Rica from 2002 to 2012 in a 10 year period and is measured in millions of kilograms. Overall it is immediately apparent that, despite some fluctuations, over the period as a whole the coffee exportation increased gradually in all three regions.
Looking carefully, Costa Rica exported the highest amount of coffee in 2002, which was 15 million kilograms. The quantity of coffee exports in the same year by Brazil was approximately 7 million and finally, around 5 million kilograms of coffee was shipped by Colombia. Over the next following four years, Brazil as well as Colombia managed to trade more coffee than previous years, while it dipped in case of Costa Rica. However, the export figures of Brazil and Costa Rica followed a similar trend from 2006 to 2012, increasing steadily to 20 million (Costa Rica) and 25 million (Brazil). On the contrary, Colombia witnessed a speedy collapse to 2008, when exports hit a low of approximately 2.5 million, but then it jumped dramatically to end the period at 15 million per year.
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.Summarise the information by selecting and r 73
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below 70
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorernations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it theresponsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after theircitizens themselves? 67
- Average number of hours per week spent doing activities around the home 56
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, well, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00510204082 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70953915958 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7884943317 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.142857143 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4285714286 5.23603664747 256% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2342162043 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121978546967 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866385091925 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216721310217 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739112153087 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.