The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph given below elucidates the types of food consumed by the Australians and how the rate of consumption has been changed from 1975 to 2000. The category of food includes Pizza, Fish & Chips, and Hamburgers.

Overall, Pizza and Hamburgers had the lowest rate of consumption, which is only 10 times in 1975. While the Australians liked to eat Fish and Chips, which is 90 times more than both the other two foods. After 1975, the Hamburgers are being popular among Australians and sell over 90 times between 1980 to 1985. In addition, the rate of eating pizza constantly increasing year by year and peak the same as Fish and Chips in the year 1987. In contrary, the Fish and chips fall down to 80 times in 1980 and faced slightly increased in 1985.

From 1990, the level of buying pizza by Australians reached to 60 times and ended up to stay at 85 times in 2000. However, the Fish and Chips confronted a declining situation after 1985 and closed to 40 times in the same. Furthermore, the Hamburgers get the highest rate with 100 times in the year 2000 which was looked up by Fish and chips in 1975.

Therefore, the Hamburgers takeover the place of Fish and Chips and is the most favorite food among Australians in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, therefore, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61085972851 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46537996435 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.433322323 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6363636364 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145064498006 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681566474305 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100148505558 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129336335113 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108714102888 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.