The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to Scotland who traveled on aquarium, castle,zoo, festival from 1980 to 2010.
From basic observation, the percentage of the zoo visitors and the castle travellers climbed remarkably by contrast, the proportion festival and aquarium travellers declined significant from 1980 to 2010.
Starting at 30%, the proportion of the festival travellers was the most spending on Scotland, following by citadel of visitors and the aquarium traveller. Moreover, the lowest is the zoo of visitors in 1980. The percentage of festival travellers slipped steadily back 25% from 1980 to 1990. There was a significant increase of 20% in the castle travellers from 1980 to 1990. The proportion of aquatic museum travellers boomed sharply by 35% in 1985 but later declined slightly to 20% in 1990 The percentage of the 200 usitors plateaued steadily to from 10% to 15% between 1980 to 1990.
With a reference to travellers had to 45% the percentage of the castle proportion of the festival and quatic museum had near 25%, the percentage of the zoo tourists had to 10% in 1995. The percentage of the citadel decreased significant to 10% in 2010. The proportion of the aquatic museum tourists witnessed a considerably plummet of 10% in 2010. There was a steady drop of 5% in the percentage of
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 56
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , zoo
...cotland who traveled on aquarium, castle,zoo, festival from 1980 to 2010. From b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...val travellers slipped steadily back 25% from 1980 to 1990. There was a significa...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt to 10% in 2010. The proportion of the aquatic museum tourists witnessed a cons...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('plummet') instead of another adjective.
... the aquatic museum tourists witnessed a considerably plummet of 10% in 2010. There was a steady dro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erably plummet of 10% in 2010. There was a steady drop of 5% in the percentage of...
^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a steady drop of 5% in the percentage of
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08181818182 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96931970393 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404545454545 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4092168717 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.076498804481 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388005918676 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316485560006 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631817710913 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393029471835 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.