The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 in the UK
The given line graph compares the changing proportion of viewers on a daily basis in the UK for the year 1992.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number of radio lovers rises significantly in the morning times, while tv watchers experience a dramatic spike during the evening hours. However, early mornings observe a similar trend for both the mediums.
According to the given illustration, under 6% of people listened to the radio and watched tv sharp at 1 a.m. With the passing time, between 3 a.m to 5 a.m, the proportion for both remained low (nearly 3% each). As the day passed, a steady rise climbed the radio listeners' percentage to a peak value of 25% at 9 a.m. Although the tv audience shows a slight uptick, the proportion of radio lovers' remained higher by 20%.
Between 9 a.m to 11 a.m, both radio and tv witnessed a sharp fall. The former slipped to 20%, while just 3% of viewers activated the latter medium. After 11 a.m, followed by a contrasting trend, radio viewers' proportion observed few fluctuations before plummeting down to 3% only, while tv audience soared up as high as 45% at 21.00 pm, after which a steady drop down dragged the proportion by 30% at 23.00 p.m.
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 84
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'listeners'' or 'listener's'?
Suggestion: listeners'; listener's
...passed, a steady rise climbed the radio listeners percentage to a peak value of 25% at 9 ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71627906977 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63625346691 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9938995739 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16513371073 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689997978541 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727650640866 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105542676196 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686586652424 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.