Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree

The number of people who are travelling to different countries has been increasing since last few decades because of the globalisation. It is true that people face a lot of social and practical issues when they have to communicate to others in a foreign language. I completely agree with this notion. The reasons for this stand will be expressed in the following paragraphs.

To comments with, there are myriad reasons behind social problems while speaking in foreign language. One of the most prominent reasons is that languages represent their local cultures. When people leave their native place and settle down in a different countries then they have to adapt foreign language along with their culture. Otherwise, they will face a lot of problems from the natives. However it is difficult for some people to adapt new languages and cultures. Another point to consider is that sometimes people do not have a good command over the language where they are living then they often face many problems from society. For example, if a a person is living in English speaking country and does not no English well then native language speakers make fun of his poor English. So, he always lives in stress and anxiety.

Apart from social issues there are many practical issues people have to face. Firstly, people from different countries do not have profound knowledge of foreign language as the native people have. So, sometimes it leads to the conversation in wrong directions and creates misunderstanding between the people. Moreover, even though people have the technical knowledge in the particular field, they find difficulties in finding a job in foreign countries. This is happened because majority of the people feel hasitant while speaking in other languages then their native language.

In conclusion, I would like to read my view that although people are moving to different countries for their pasture, they find many problems related to the languages.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ace a lot of problems from the natives. However it is difficult for some people to adap...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
... problems from society. For example, if a a person is living in English speaking co...
^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... problems from society. For example, if a a person is living in English speaking ...
^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
... problems from society. For example, if a a person is living in English speaking co...
^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... language as the native people have. So, sometimes it leads to the conversation i...
^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use majority of the people feel hasitant while speaking in other languages then t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 965.302439024 171% => OK
No of words: 320.0 196.424390244 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.146875 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66526961289 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503125 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 283.868780488 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8299239204 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232354231964 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756015821972 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053111369461 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136178249856 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618726889402 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.