In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
The number of elderly people in many countries experiences a burgeoning increase in the recent decade. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative consequences led by this issue.
The increasing life expectancy might be caused by several social issues. First of all, many people over 60-year-old are not financially independent and do not have regular income to fulfil their basic necessity and that increasing the old age dependency ratio. so, the government have to support their life by providing living allowances and accommodations. If the government do not have to allocate this funding for elderly programs, the money can be invested on other public purposes such as education and technology sector having more impact on the society and nation.
However, the rising number of people over 60-year old indicates development of a nation because this specifies that the country has a better improvement in the health sector. Take several developed nations such as Japan and French as an example, having more than 15% of elder people population caused by the increasing of life expectancy to more than 80 years. this means that the countries have the best health services for the public so that could improve their physical well-being and life longer.
To sum up, an additional number of older people population in several countries should be considered both negative and positive effects. The drawback of this phenomenon is that the government require to initiate and funding many programs for the elderly to make sure their well-being, while the merit of this issue is the nations experienced a prosperous trend a general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-01 | gur1040894 | 78 | view |
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- the bar chart below shows the number of research students studying a different subject in 2005. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where is relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ncreasing the old age dependency ratio. so, the government have to support their l...
^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... life expectancy to more than 80 years. this means that the countries have the best ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'initiating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: initiating
...enomenon is that the government require to initiate and funding many programs for the elder...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, while, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78338735699 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4218426496 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235865027378 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886011248071 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432177154496 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153951696142 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023210284174 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.