Given are the two maps delineating the transformations of the waterfront area of the town named Darwin during a period of 5 years, commencing from 2009.
It is perceptible that there were drastic modifications reported mostly in the south with the construction and replacement; however, there were also some parts of the area that stayed unchanged.
In 2009, in the south, the large industrial area was knocked down to make way for the trees, and there was the footpath running from west to east that led to the harbour which was newly built near the coastline in 2014. On top of the wood, there were six residential buildings which used to be just a half while there was the university building to the west of these buildings.
Meanwhile, inside a circular footpath in the upper part of the map, the smaller industrial area was superseded by the small swimming pool which was adjacent to the original lake and some trees. On the seashore, there were two big swimming pools that remained from the past with the school on the opposite side. There was the road leading to the fishing area in the northeast that stayed unchanged.
- Schools are the only place to receive true education Do you agree or disagree 76
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the various stages involved in the production of beer 84
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching tv or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- THE MAP BELOW SHOW THE CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE TOWN AT THE SEASIDE RESORT OF BEACH BETWEEN 1950 AND 1990 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the transforma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76530612245 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62659483295 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4407877555 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124789204799 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620687119744 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740354396046 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917466972937 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821038768065 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.