The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The diagram delivers visual information about proposed changes to an area used for industrialization within Norbiton town.

Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there will be a bridge constructed across the river in the North in order to make use of farmland area. In addition, more housings and amenities will be placed while factories are predicted to be demolished.

Looking at the second map of Norbiton, we can see that a bridge will run through from its centre to the north side of the town, which will cross the river. Housing will also be built in this particular site. Moreover, a new roundabout is planned to be at the central south for better transportation.

Furthermore, the current factories located around the road are planned to be tear down. Amenities such as playground, educational facility, hospital and stores will replace the factories. Residential areas will also be constructed in the west and east side of the town.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-14 hahoaan 73 view
2024-09-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-09-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-09-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-09-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user hyst12 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, moreover, second, so, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96202527842 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64375 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6313923101 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137239344248 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592549783976 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510973911267 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965753442551 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524137200684 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.