The provided maps illustrate how the village of Stokeford changed between 1930 and 2010.
The most striking difference is a vast increase in the number of private homes, developed on land formerly used for farming, and an overall expansion of the village. Some old buildings were updated and their purpose was changed, while a few other stayed on their old locations.
Focusing on changes, it is possible to notice that three lateral street connected to a main road were built by 2010. Additionally, a ring road was constructed in the middle of the village, and new houses were built alongside all the streets. A primary school, and large house building were expanded, however the purpose of the latter was changed into retirement home. Two shops, located just above the post office building on 1930 map, did not exist in 2010.
Admittedly, some structures, like a post office building, bridge and a few houses did not change at all during the given period of eight decades. The main road, leading to the bridge from the South, did not undergo any changes as well, although it was used as the basis for the village expansion. The river Stoke, passing on the West side of the village, remained unspoiled.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 83
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 35
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89805825243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48983701075 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616504854369 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105733569731 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048990238436 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075193685468 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890114229623 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925541792097 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.