The map illustrates how Village Park has been developed over the past 10 years.
Overall, the infrastructure of the park has been improved dramatically, including a cycle path around the facility.
Noticeably, the south side of the park has been altered the most. A picnic area has been built to the south of the car park, which has been expanded to house 50 cars instead of 20 cars 10 years back. Furthermore, the pond has been converted into a boating lake. Many trees in the woods have been chopped down to build a café.
In addition, the children’s play area has been divided into 2 parts, and the southern part is now the children’s soft play area. New toilets have been constructed to the south of the children’s play area. The tennis court has also been extended to house 4 courts. However, the football pitch has remained unchanged over the past10 years. A cycle path has been constructed around Village Park.
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on publictransport systems To what extend do you agree 73
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people Some people say that younger people could be leaders Do you agree or disagree 67
- The education of young people is the main priority in all over the world Some people believe education of young adults who cannot write or read is essential for the society and more funding should be made available for it To what extent do you agree or di 78
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problems of contemporary society What do you think are the main causes of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 11
- The graph below shows Twitter use by age group in the USA between November 2010 and May 2013 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86335403727 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65158473098 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.141907223 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.1818181818 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6363636364 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20220452675 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865446640266 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11077325815 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157396614559 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103313988848 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.