The picture below shows the Use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main feature and make comparison where relevant.
The given line graph illustrations the information about utilisation of renewable energy sources of Total amount of energy between 1971 and 2006 in Finland, Denmark, Germany, France, United Kingdom and United States.
Overall, it is clear that maximum amount of renewable energy was consumed by Finland; however, the United Kingdom was the lowest energy user over given period. It is apparent that use of energy in every country depicted an upward tendency.
To begin with, energy used by Finland was peaked in initial year which was about 25% of total energy; whereas, in following years it experienced fluctuations and reached at similar point (25%)till 2006. The renewable energy consumption in Denmark witnessed a small drip in 1936 , then followed by moderate incline
It is interesting to note that in unites states the usage of every was only about 8% during 1971. In contrast, after fluctuations till 1991, it inclined significantly and reached at more than 15%.
Probing further, similar trend was followed by Germany and France in using renewable energy and reached at nearby a tenth till last year. Surprising, negligible use of energy was made by United Kingdom in first year than it increased slowly until 2006.
- The given picture illustrates the life of a honey been. 56
- The charts below give Information about travel to and from the UK, a nd about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 56
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant 90
- The families and roles are changing. What are the reasons and it is positive or negative development. 73
- Some people believe that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial is creating environment problems and it should be stopped discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation about utilisation of renewable energy sources of Total amount of energ...
^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lisation of renewable energy sources of Total amount of energy between 1971 and ...
^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount of energy between 1971 and 2006 in Finland, Denmark, Germany, France, Unite...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowest energy user over given period. It is apparent that use of energy in every ...
^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear which was about 25% of total energy; whereas, in following years it experien...
^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of total energy; whereas, in following years it experienced fluctuations and re...
^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... renewable energy consumption in Denmark witnessed a small drip in 1936 , then fo...
^^
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Denmark witnessed a small drip in 1936 , then followed by moderate incline It ...
^^
Line 11, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line It is interesting to note that in unites states the usage of every was onl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25757575758 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62368349038 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5023204912 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214044787035 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106515071102 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524336333106 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132292018184 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609673445425 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.