The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010.

Essay topics:

The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010.

The two maps show the main developments in Shipsmounth in the years between 1995 and 2010.

Overall, the city underwent a significant modernization over the given period, becoming less green and more built-up.

In 1995, there were trees in both north-west and south-east corners of the city, while by 2010 they had been cut down and replaced by apartment blocks and an airport, respectively. The factory located left to the city centre was knocked down and converted into a shopping centre. The housings in the east of the city were removed, so that skyscrapers could be built on their location. another notable change is the demolition of the church to make way for a pub.

In 1995, the city had only one station, which was south of the city centre, whereas by 2010 another one hat been introduced in the north of the city. In addition, a football stadium was constructed adjacent to the southern station. over a period of fifteen, the main road in the city centre was pedestrianized.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-03 reverjae 67 view
2023-11-24 nguyenkhangtriem 61 view
2023-11-24 nguyenkhangtriem 80 view
2023-11-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 67 view
2023-10-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
Essays by user lusinelusine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...apers could be built on their location. another notable change is the demolition of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...ucted adjacent to the southern station. over a period of fifteen, the main road in t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75141360333 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.292567665 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129338117554 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515149740995 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706820673186 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901293656328 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814437560715 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.