The diagrams illustrate the spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK, for 200 and 2013.
Overall, during this interval, their income decreased while their food and cloth expenses increased. They also witnessed some changes in the proportions of these expenses.
According to the table, an average family received 29000 as income in 2010, inclined to 25000 by 2013. Whereas, their food and clothes costs rose from 14000 in 2010 to 15000 in 2013. Therefore, the ratio of such expenditures to their income grew from almost 50% to precisely 60% over these years.
In terms of food and cloth costs in 2010, they used to spend most of their income on meat and fish, by share of 29%, while this category fell to 23% and stood at second place in 2013, letting fruit and vegetables stand on top, by a 30% contribution at this year. The latter category occupied second place in 2010 with a share of 26%.
The third food group, dairy products, accounted for 15% and 13% respectively in 2010 and 2013, moving from the fourth costly category to the fifth. Other foods also compromised 18% of expenses in both years, as the third expensive segment. Besides, clothes were considered the least costly in 2010 by 12% proportion, changing to the fourth rank with a 16% share in 2013.
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do yuou think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 89
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station 039 Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the com 70
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55701754386 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38136085073 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521929824561 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 228.0 22.4926829268 1014% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1039.0 112.824112599 921% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 228.0 22.9334400587 994% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 68.0 5.23603664747 1299% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232147830284 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232147830284 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170590422153 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154149981675 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 114.0 13.2329268293 861% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -134.56 61.2550243902 -220% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 88.7 10.3012195122 861% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.65 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.51 8.06136585366 217% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 93.2 10.9970731707 847% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 89.0 11.0658536585 804% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.