The pie chart illustrates the proportion of four factors that affect land degradation. Meanwhile, the table gives information about the effect of these four factors on North America, Europe, and Oceania in the 1990s.
From an overall perspective, it can be observed that the primary reason for decreasing the land's productivity is over-gazing. The table shows Europe has the highest percentage of degraded land, in contrast, North America has the smallest proportion.
The first graph displays the percentage of the four main reasons, including over-grazing, deforestation, over-cultivation, and others, which cause land degradation. As the pie chart depicts over-grazing with 35% ranks first. Deforestation with just 5% and 8% difference with over-grazing are the second and third factors.
The table presents that deforestation with 9.8% and over-cultivation with 7.7% has the highest percentage of land deforesting in Europe. Over-grazing accounts for 11.3% of the land degrading in Oceania and is the major reason for this phenomenon. The table shows that North America with 5% and Europe with 23% has the lowest and largest total degraded land.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... America Europe and Oceania in the 1990s From an overall perspective it can be ob...
^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lands'' or 'land's'?
Suggestion: lands'; land's
...t the primary reason for decreasing the lands productivity is overgazing The table sh...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orth America has the smallest proportion The first graph displays the percentage ...
^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and others which cause land degradation As the pie chart depicts overgrazing wit...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grazing are the second and third factors The table presents that deforestation wi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32954545455 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04010724582 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 176.0 22.4926829268 782% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 938.0 112.824112599 831% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 176.0 22.9334400587 767% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 48.0 5.23603664747 917% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18160519719 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18160519719 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119376087338 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247379583958 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 91.7 13.2329268293 693% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -107.16 61.2550243902 -175% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 71.9 10.3012195122 698% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.82 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.04 8.06136585366 199% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 11.4329268293 551% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 72.4 10.9970731707 658% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 72.0 11.0658536585 651% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.