The pie chart illustrates the reasons of global land degradation, whereas the table depicts country wise causes in the year 1990.
Overall, it can be observed that the over-grazing was the biggest cause of land deterioration globally while regionally it can be seen that over cultivation was the main cause of degradation in north America, deforestation for Europe and overgrazing proportion were the highest for Oceania respectively.
To begin with, the pie chart compares the proportion of how the agricultural land becomes less productive. It is analysed that the main cause of it is over grazing which comprises of 35% respectively whereas deforestation and over cultivation accounts for 30 and 28 %. The other causes of land losing the usefulness consisted of 7%.
Secondly, the regional distribution of the causes was subdivided into three categories and all the regions showed different reasons for its degradation. North America showed over cultivation of 3.3 % as the highest cause of land to be unfertile, nevertheless Europe region had deforestation as the main reason for degradation consisting of 9.8 % and overgrazing was observed to be the leading reason for Oceania region which accounted for 11.3 % respectively.
- IELTS WRITING TASK I The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 62
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts Cambridge ielts book 1 test 2 writing task 1 73
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 w
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... main cause of it is over grazing which comprises of 35% respectively whereas deforestation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44502617801 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22039849544 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.5764389152 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246787821674 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133619280918 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539671396787 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160912300162 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469403392498 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.